Chicken gay definition
There are plenty of articles about the revelations going on Exodus. Exodus was recently rocked by having its leader come out as totally gay and stating that it can't be fixed. Also, what Exodus currently says is not what its past positions and involvement have been. You wanted sources for Exodus and the "hate groups", I supplied them. Nothing new in that article to comment on. And it is really sad when customer come up and talk about supporting CFA for being "anti-gay." That is very sad!
But Chick-fil-A restaurants are operated by independent owners, and employee experience can vary widely depending on the person running a particular chain."ĭoesn't sound like a company policy of homophobia but rather some bad apples which you'll get anywhere (not just CFA). "Several of the gay and lesbian employees interviewed by The Huffington Post said that they liked their work, and had never witnessed incidents of homophobia or discrimination on the job. I think there is a difference! That's not to say that I agree with their message and their purpose but I can really label as "hate." I have never heard of this organization before but I can hardly call those messages "hate." They believe they are trying to help. These actions have no place in our society and we must, instead, affirm behavior that validates the personal worth and dignity God bestows upon every human being. Therefore, we strongly oppose bullying, name calling and acts of aggression against any individual or group of individuals for any reason. "Exodus International affirms that gay-identified individuals and those who struggle with same-sex attraction are persons for whom Jesus Christ died and loves equally. Accordingly, Exodus does not endorse any individual or organization that is known to use that method." "Exodus International is opposed to the therapeutic practice commonly referred to as “holding/touch therapy” as a healing exercise for those with same-sex attraction distress. Finally, we stand with the LGBT community both in spirit, and when necessary, legally and physically, when violence rears it’s head in Uganda, Jamaica or anywhere else in the world." We stand with all who are defending this basic, biblical tenet and remain committed to sharing the compassion, hope and life-giving grace and truth of Jesus Christ.
"As such, Exodus International has not supported and will not support any legislation that deprives others of life and dignity based on their sexual orientation or the expression of such within the confines of a consensual adult relationship. "We do not believe that same-sex attractions are sinful in and of themselves but rather one type of struggle and temptation among the millions that impact each and every human being." They want their expression of love redefined as "marriage".they want something more than a "contract" right, which they already have. If that was the case, the whole "marriage" argument would've died a long time ago. they already have right to enter in a "contract" with their same-sex partner through a "civil union". Most of those agruing for the right to call their contractual "civil union" a "marriage" aren't arguing for the right to enter into a "contract". The legal definition is that of a contract.the social, moral and religious definitions are different. The whole argument about animals, inanimate objects, and the like, is simply ridiculous. Only parties with the capacity to contract (read: generally adult humans) can validly enter into a contract. This is a ridiculous argument, though it's one that seems to be quite popular. I don't especially want children raised by people who are intolerant of others for no valid reason, but unfortunately, it's not my decision any more than it should be yours. So you think that gays and lesbians should not be allowed to have children because you don't WANT children raised by two parents of the same sex? What about single parents? Unwed couples who have children? What about parents with serious illnesses? Should their children be taken away since they don't meet your standard of the "normal" two parent household? Just wondering where you'd draw the line and why. This whole thing just reeks of political correctness, and vote buying. I don't want children raised by two parents of the same sex. But we're going against 100,000 years of human history here folks, by allowing men to marry men and women to marry women. You want to be gay? Fine, doesn't bother me. Personally I think allowing gay marriage is just another nail in the coffin of this country.